%3Fxml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"%3F>
I attended the annual Conference this past weekend. I was thoroughly impressed with the lineup of workshops and the breadth of knowledge shown by the speakers. These practitioners work in a very niche market and are often called upon to navigate areas of law never contemplated by the Legislature or Courts.
I was attending a workshop on tax issues when another lawyer asked if any of the companies in town offer a gay gross up. Recall that I have about the increased tax burden on same-sex couples where an employee covers his or her partner on an employer health insurance plan. In brief – the amount paid by the employer to cover the non-employee partner is deemed taxable income to the employee and taxed accordingly. The benefit of the coverage is imputed to the partner – thus the term “imputed taxes.”
This may not seem like much but it can represent a substantial increase in one’s tax burden but it can add up to the employee making an average wage with standard coverage owing the IRS an additional $2,000.
Some companies have noted the unfairness of this policy and have sought to offset this discriminatory tax burden by paying the difference directly to the employee. This leads me back to the question posed by an attorney at the MLBA Law Conference. Do any of Minnesota’s companies offer to gross up? Keep in mind that we’re not talking small Mom and Pop shops here as Minnesota has headquartered here. To begin my review of local companies and the gay gross up, I turned to Tara Siegel Bernard, a writer of the Bucks Blog at the New York Times as she has been providing timely . Her latest update includes a chart of companies, sorted by industry, and their response to inquiries on the subject. In reviewing these issues, I noted that only 13 of 20 Fortune 500 companies even offer Domestic Partner benefits, so it seems safe to bet they don’t offer a gay gross up on such benefits. The following 7 do not allow coverage for a domestic partner: CHS, C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Thrivent Financial for Lutherans, Hormel Foods, Mosaic, Nash-Finch and Alliant Techsystems.
In reviewing the chart, I am sad to report that local companies are not fairing too well. Below is a list of the Minnesota companies that made the Bucks chart. I won’t keep you in suspense – NONE of them offer to even the playing field for their same-sex employees. While none of our law firms are large enough to make it onto Bucks radar, I do not know of any local firm that offers to offset the tax liability of covering a partner on an employee’s health insurance plan. If anyone knows otherwise, please feel free to comment and let me know.
Name Reimbursement Policy Future Plans
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minn.* No “Considering for the future.”
Best Buy* No No plans at this time
General Mills* buy propecia canada
Medtronic* No Currently evaluating
This is an abysmal batting average for Minnesota companies, but I shouldn’t be surprised as these are the exact companies (with the brace exception of St. Jude’s who stood proud) who have avoided standing up for their gay employees in the fight against the Marriage Discrimination Amendment. Please note that there are many other Fortune 500 companies that didn’t make the Bucks chart. In the continuing weeks I will continue to delve into these companies in search of a company that stands by its Gay and Lesbian employees. Stay tuned.
credit:

Senator Al Franken continues publicly fight for our right to marry as he does in the the video shown below. Please take a minute to thank the Senator for his support.
Thank you Senator Franken for fighting for my family.

I am honored to announce that the Gay Estate was named as a Top 25 Blawg for Minnesota for 2011. Thank you to the folks at Practice Law and the Minnesota State Bar Association for the selection – and kind words about my blog.
I wasn’t aware that The Gay Estate had even been nominated for this honor so would also like to use this post to thank the person(s) who nominated the blog. It is nice to have some recognition for my efforts at putting together a useful resource for non-traditional families.
Please also check out the other great blogs at .
]]>
After my partner gave birth to our wonderful daughter 4 years ago, we immediately began working with a lawyer on the second-parent adoption process. A second-parent adoption is the legal procedure through which the non-birth parent (me) may adopt the child of the biological parent. During the process, our lawyer mentioned that there is a granted to adopting parents. The one-time tax credit allows adoptive parents to seek “reimbursement” for the money spent on the adoption expenses. Because we are both lawyers, we spent some time researching the adoption credit and decided that it was risky as the IRS sometimes refused the use of the tax credit by same-sex couples when applied toward a second-parent adoption. So, we declined claiming the credit on our return that year.
But, as is true of all things related to same-sex couples right now – things are about to change. The Government Accountability Office criticized the IRS for its failure to properly train staff members on how to handle tax credits and second-parent adoptions. This lead to the unthinkable – the IRS admitted it made a mistake in not giving its auditors proper guidance on this issue.
What was the IRS’s reasoning behind denying the credit? One explanation it gave was that the birth mother does not terminate her parental rights as part of the adoption procedure. While that may be true, it is also irrelevant. There is nothing in the federal tax code that prohibits claiming the adoption credit for adopting a domestic partner’s child.
The IRS did explain that when the taxpayers in question pushed back on the issue, the taxpayers usually won – after spending money and time fighting the IRS. Hopefully, after this, those couples may spend time and money on more importants things: like daycare, diapers and life insurance premiums until the day when a same-sex couples are granted the same benefits (social security survivor benefits or estate tax free inheritance) as other married automatically get upon marriage.
Of course, this issue would be moot if the nonbiological parent was given the right to be on the birth certificate in the first place. But, that’s a continuing fight for our future rights. As for now, I have one question:
Do we get to amend our 2007 tax return to get this deduction?

Image via Wikipedia
As you know, gay couples do not have access to many of the benefits that come with legalized marriage. Because of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) the federal government does not recognize gay marriages – even for those who are married in states in which it is legal. As a result, the federal tax code does not recognize same-sex unions.
So, the Tax Code treats the value of employer-provided healthcare benefits for a civil union or domestic partner as ‘imputed income’ to the employee. This means that employees who elect domestic partner benefits must pay income tax on the value of those benefits. So, while many companies offer health insurance coverage for same sex partners, the employees who take advantage of that benefit – just as their straight colleagues do – pay more for it.
But a growing number of companies are attempting to combat this injustice by covering the extra costs that same-sex couples pay for these health benefits through what’s known as a “tax gross-up.” There term tax gross-ups refers to the practice of employers making employees whole for additional taxes owed, thereby ensuring that employees receive the true dollar amount promised to them as compensation.
Companies such as Google, Bank of America, Barclays, Cisco, Discovery Channel and the Klimpton Hotel chain have already agreed to reimburse U.S. employees whose health benefit for same-sex partners or spouses are treated as taxable income by the IRS. And yesterday, Morgan Stanley announced that it will begin reimbursing employees for the extra taxes they pay on health insurance for their same-sex partners starting January 1, 2012.
Does your company offer a gross up? Check with your HR department today to be sure that you don’t miss out on benefits that may be available to you. And if they don’t offer a gross up – ask them why.
Please note that the at the New York Times keeps an updated list of the companies that offer a tax gross up.

buy propecia canada
Your life insurance needs will depend on a number of factors, including the size of your family, the nature of your financial obligations, your career stage, and your goals. For example, when you’re young, you may not have a great need for life insurance. However, as you take on more responsibilities and your family grows, your need for life insurance increases.
Here are some questions that can help you start thinking about the amount of life insurance you need:
These are just a few questions to get you started thinking about your life insurance needs. My next few posts will discuss different types of life insurance and why it can be critical for non-traditional families.
credit:
]]>Permanent insurance policies offer protection for your entire life, regardless of your health, provided you pay the premium to keep the policy in force. As you pay your premiums, a portion of each payment is placed in the cash value account. During the early years of the policy, the cash value contribution is a large portion of each premium payment. As you get older, and the true cost of your insurance increases, the portion of your premium payment devoted to the cash value decreases. The cash value continues to grow–tax deferred–as long as the policy is in force.
You can borrow against the cash value, but unpaid policy loans will reduce the death benefit that your beneficiary will receive. If you surrender the policy before you die (i.e., cancel your coverage), you’ll be entitled to receive the cash value, minus any loans and surrender charges.
Many different types of cash value life insurance are available, including:
With so many types of life insurance available, you’re sure to find a policy that meets your needs and your budget. With so many choices, understanding which policy meets your needs and your budget can be navigated with a trusted life insurance professional. The Dworsky Agency can find the right policy for your needs and budget without a fee for service.
]]>
buy propecia canada
I believe that it goes without saying that everyone should . What is true of most families is doubly so when it comes to members of buy propecia canada. A will is your last opportunity to direct the state of your affairs, allocate monies or items to those you wish, and to provide your desires regarding the . Naturally, your first order of business after creating the will is to place the buy propecia canada in a location where it will be easily obtainable and found—not a copy! Copies can prolong the and therefore prolong the length of time before your assets can be distributed to their intended receiver. As I’ve already stated, wills sometimes appoint the guardianship of your children, therefore it is extra important—especially for unique families to have original and appropriate paperwork designating the custody of children.
Finding a home for the original document depends, certainly, upon your financial situation. Not everyone can afford a safety deposit box. I offer inexpensive storage of your documents as part of my estate planning package, not all attorney’s do, however. Still, depending upon the circumstances you are in there are safe storage methods for original documents, such as safe’s or lockboxes. Any location will do as long as it can easily be found by the right people and is easily retrievable in the event of your death. That means no burying it in the backyard like pirate’s treasure or putting it in the freezer (yes, this happens).
Many estate planners such as myself advocate the use of a by families that are concerned that their wishes and desires could be overruled, or that their assets would be delayed distribution in probate. Living trusts are harder to dispute in a court of law because (you) are the first “trustee” and as such establish a precedent for how you wish the trust to be managed. As with the will, the original document is absolutely 100% necessary for your beneficiaries and trustees to have on hand.
I cannot over-emphasize the importance of these two documents for any family, but especially for unique families. I have witnessed some of the most heart-breaking atrocities happen after people pass on. Children are taken away from the only living parent that they have ever known. Partners who worked to help support a family have lost homes and possessions. I don’t mean to scare anyone—well, maybe just a little—I honestly feel that in this rather uncertain political climate those of us with unique families must take those extra steps to provide for the people we love and cherish the most. Having an original will and/or revocable living trust helps us do just that.
credit:
]]>Although having adequate life insurance is important for most couples, unmarried couples should particularly consider how life insurance can help them address the concerns unmarried couples and a unique family may face.
Because you’re not married, you’re ineligible for many of the benefits the government, employers and the tax code confer on married partners. For example, Social Security and defined benefits pension plans don’t replace income for your partner after your death, as they do for a spouse. Tax laws don’t shelter your estate, as they do for a married couple.
buy propecia canada
No, with the right strategies you may protect yourself and your family. One such tool is life insurance. Life insurance can provide a vehicle to address these concerns. It can replace income after the death of your partner, provide cash to pay potential estate taxes and provide funds that avoid probate.
buy propecia canada
As the surviving partner in an unmarried couple, you may face a greater financial burden in maintaining your standard of living after the death of your partner than does a surviving spouse. You are not be eligible to receive income from many of the sources available to a surviving spouse, or you may receive only limited benefits. Life insurance provides a method to provide replacement income to your partner. You can structure this by cross-owning life insurance policies or by purchasing an individual policy with your partner as the beneficiary.
Example(s): Shawn and Chris are an unmarried couple. They each buy a life insurance policy on the other. When Shawn died, Chris invested the proceeds and lives off the interest. Because Chris owned the policy, the proceeds paid upon Shawn’s death were not included in Shawn’s estate and were not subject to federal estate taxes when she died. However, the value of the policy Shawn owned on Chris’s life was included in Shawn’s estate for federal tax purposes.
Caution: Because you own the policy, it is includable in your estate when you die for federal estate tax purposes. Any amount over the estate applicable exclusion amount may be subject to estate taxes.
Example(s): Shawn owned a policy, naming Chris as the beneficiary. When Shawn died in 2011, the proceeds of the policy were includable in her estate. If Shawn’s taxable estate exceeded the applicable exclusion amount of $5 million, the excess would be subject to estate tax beginning at a rate of 18 percent up to 35 percent. The potential estate tax on Shawn’s estate, including the value of life insurance she owned at his death, would have significantly cut into the amount available to Chris.
Further, you may avoid having the life insurance policy included in your estate for purposes of calculating your tax liability by working with an estate planning attorney to create an Irrevocable Life Insurance Policy (ILIT). The details of planning with an ILIT will be discussed in a later post.
buy propecia canada: How to determine your buy propecia canada needs.
Questions and comments, contact Jay Dworsky at or email:jdworsky@wisconsinfinancial.com.
